Quantcast
Channel: Movie Review – 1,2,3 WTF!? (Watch the Film)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 109

mother! Explained…for Now

$
0
0

Spoiler Alert:

I shall be digging deep and exhuming all of mother!, so don’t read any further unless you’re ready to see mother! completely naked.

Note

This post is simply a crib sheet to the film. I shall do a proper review when the DVD release date approaches, but I sense there are a lot of readers with many questions on this film, so I thought I’d address them here. Much of my analysis was gleaned from Collider, Vanity Fair, The Telegraph U.K., and Time, though I’ve also added my own 2 pence as concerns the ending. I haven’t seen this perspective mentioned elsewhere, so I thought I’d publish it here.

Established symbolism

The General Idea: The film is about the Bible, especially Genesis and bits of the New Testament. Him (Javier Bardem) plays the poet/creator, and Jennifer Lawrence plays Mother, meaning Mother Earth.

The Initial Guests: Man (Ed Harris) represents Adam and Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer) represents Eve. They arrive in the Garden but partake of the forbidden fruit (by breaking the crystal) and so are thrown out of the house. Before they can be exiled, however, the Oldest Son (Domhnall Gleeson) kills his Younger Brother (Brian Gleeson) in a retelling of the tale in Genesis when Cain kills his younger brother Abel.

The Bloody Floorboard: The earth is a living being, not an object. When she’s hurt, she bleeds.

The Sink: The sink that collapses represents the flood. Humans are mucking about and not doing as they’re told, so a flood is sent to clear them all out of the earth.

The Basement: The hidden room in the basement represents the entrance to Hell.

The Poem: After the Flood has cleared everyone away, the Creator makes a new creation which is idolized by the world. Unfortunately, the creation is so beautiful that everyone comes to the house and destroy it by their sheer number, greed and selfishness.

The Baby: The Baby is Jesus, and is sacrificed by the adoring masses and then eaten in a parallel to the Communion, where Christians eat the body and drink the blood of Christ.

The Yellow Powder / Liquid: No clue. Please leave a comment explaining what it is. [In the comments, one reader (thank you, John), points out that the powder is a sort of elixir to calm her shattered nerves. I’m just wondering if there isn’t a more allegorical meaning. What would the planet earth take if it were feeling stressed?]

The Crystal: The crystal represents Love. In the final sequence, the Poet desperately asks if she’s still in love with him and she begrudgingly admits that she does. Then he asks her for one more thing before she goes and she says she only has one thing left to give. Following that, he reaches into her chest and pulls the crystal from where her heart would be. [A shout out to Simon, who explained this in the comments!]

The Ending: [What follows is my personal interpretation] I think that Darren Aronofsky strays from his initial outline in the third act. Rather than continuing to focus on the Biblical aspect of the film, he opens it up to include aspects of his own, personal story in the movie.

Aronofsky sees himself as God, in a sense and, as he’s an atheist, this doesn’t trouble him all that much. After all, God and film directors are both creators who are looking to please the masses. Aronofsky realizes here that he’s drawn to the adoration of fans, to the point where he unwittingly lets them distract him from his personal life. Like the Poet in the film, he finds it difficult to turn away admirers, even when they are invading his privacy.

That adoration can be more important to a creator than the love of a partner. After all, what is the logical outcome when presented with a choice between the love of one or the love of many? For someone who craves love and attention, that choice is an easy one.

When the creator turns his back on the person who loves him the most, she then destroys the relationship between them. She’s the one who demolishes the house, not the others. That she leaves saddens him, but also prepares the way for a new relationship where he’ll continue to make the same mistakes. My personal take on the ending of the film, then, is that it’s autobiographical. Aronofsky recognizes his own need for attention and admiration can interfere with his personal relationships, going so far as causing some of them to end. Yet he doesn’t learn from this, because when one relationship ends, he simply moves on to the next.

That’s it then! What do you think of my analysis? Do you have any questions about the symbolism? Does my interpretation of the ending ring true? Please feel to leave a comment with any questions or observations of your own! I’d love to hear what you think!

Also, if you know somebody who has seen or might want to see the film, please consider sharing it on Facebook or other social media! The more of us there are, the merrier it will be when we decipher the entire movie!

 



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 109

Trending Articles